This vignette replicates the ordinal logistic regression example done by the UCLA Statistical Consulting Group. It demonstrates how to use the `pomcheckr`

package to check if the proportional odds assumption holds.

```
head(ologit)
#> # A tibble: 6 x 4
#> apply pared public gpa
#> <fct> <fct> <fct> <dbl>
#> 1 very likely 0 0 3.26
#> 2 somewhat likely 1 0 3.21
#> 3 unlikely 1 1 3.94
#> 4 somewhat likely 0 0 2.81
#> 5 somewhat likely 0 0 2.53
#> 6 unlikely 0 1 2.59
```

`ologit`

is a synthetic data set consisting of the following:

apply - indicates how likely a student is to apply to graduate school

pared - 1 if at least one parent has a graduate degree, 0 otherwise

public - 1 if the undergraduate institution if public, 0 otherwise

gpa - the studentâ€™s grade point average

Some of the descriptive statistics from the example are repeated below.

```
## one at a time, table apply, pared, and public
lapply(ologit[, c("apply", "pared", "public")], table)
#> $apply
#>
#> unlikely somewhat likely very likely
#> 220 140 40
#>
#> $pared
#>
#> 0 1
#> 337 63
#>
#> $public
#>
#> 0 1
#> 343 57
```

The source page describes various analysis methods that one might consider and what the limitations are with respect to this data set. Since the outcome `apply`

is an ordered, categorical variable an ordered logistic (aka cumulative logit) model is an appropriate choice.

A key assumption of an ordinal logistic regression is that the odds of adjacent categories are proportional (i.e., the slope coefficients are the same). The score test is sometimes used to test this assumption, but it tends to be conservative and rejects the null more often than it should. The source page illustrates a graphical method for checking this assumption, and `pomcheckr`

will automatically generate the necessary plots.

The basic idea is a series of binary logistic regressions without the parallel slopes assumption are run on the response against the predictors. Then we check for equality of the slope coefficients across levels of the predictor (or cutpoints if the predictor is continuous). See the source page for further details.

In the above plots, the slope coefficients are roughly equal for both `pared`

and `gpa`

. However, the plot for `public`

suggests the parallel slopes assumption is *not* satisfied for that predictor.